This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letter to the Editor

May 7, 2013

Why should insurers get a free pass?

There are two other important points the Supreme Court should consider when deciding whether Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. By Steven W. Murray

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

There are two other important points the Supreme Court should consider when deciding whether Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. (1988) 46 Cal. 4th 287, bars Section 17200 suits against insurers. ["State high court looks to untangle overlapping statutes," April 26]. First, the majority erred in stating the Legislature had never "expressly or impliedly adopted the holding in [Royal Globe v. Superior Court (1979) 2...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up