This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

May 2, 2013

Plaintiffs look to PAGA as class certification gets tougher

This generally results in fewer people being included in the representative action (though it might not mean less exposure given that PAGA penalties are quite high). By Laura Reathaford


By Laura Reathaford


California's Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) of 2004 is a unique statute which gives employees the right to represent other employees and pursue fines on behalf of the labor commissioner if the employee believes his or her employer has violated the California Labor Code.


In Arias v. Superior Court, 46 Cal. 4th 969 (2009), the state Supreme Court found that representative suits under PAGA need not be certified as class...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up