This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

May 2, 2013

Insurance brokers' duties to third parties continue to shrink

A new appellate decision clarifies the duties owed by insurance brokers to third-party claimants. By Robert J. McKennon and Victor T. Xu


By Robert J. McKennon and Victor T. Xu


In California, insurance brokers owe extensive duties to their clients and they can be sued if they negligently breach those duties. However, the question arises: Do insurance brokers owe a duty of reasonable care to those persons or entities who are not their clients? Over two decades ago, in Nowlon v. Koram Insurance Center, Inc., 1 Cal. App. 4th 1437 (1991), the state Court of Appeals answered this question ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up