Letter to the Editor
Apr. 25, 2013
Reverse CEQA analysis is no solution
It is true that there is uncertainty regarding the appropriate scope of CEQA analysis. Engaging in reverse analysis and shifting mitigation obligations from the cause to the recipient is not the solution. By Stephanie Shakofsky
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN
In his April 16 column, "Proposed CEQA bills would clarify law, protect public health," Erin Chalmers supports legislation to expand the scope of CEQA analysis to include the impact of the environment on the project, as opposed to the project's impacts on the environment. In contending that the risk of attracting new people to existing environmental hazards is a proper CEQA concern, Chalmers ignores the considerable number of l...For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In