This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Apr. 24, 2013

State high court splits, less on ideology but on how much to rely on legislative history

The state Supreme Court, once noted for its unanamity, has issued a string of 4-3 rulings in recent months, reflecting a division between justices who cite the language of the law and those who rely more on its legislative history.


By Emily Green


Daily Journal Staff Writer


The state Supreme Court has been both praised and criticized for its unanimity. Over a 12-month period in 2011-12, the court issued just one 4-3 decision, a reflection of the justices' willingness to find consensus on even the most divisive topics. But since August, the court has issued five 4-3 decisions in a mix of civil and criminal cases. The breakdown of the justices' positions defies ideological an...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up