This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental

Apr. 20, 2013

CERCLA apportionment unworkable

As presented, the facts in PCS Nitrogen represent the quintessential example of why apportionment, as a practical construct, is unworkable. By Christopher W. Smith and Steven L. Hoch


By Christopher W. Smith and Steven L. Hoch


As presented, the facts in PCS Nitrogen Inc. v. Ashley II of Charleston LLC, Nos. 11-1662, -2087, -2099, -2104, and -2297 (4th Cir. April 4, 2013), represent the quintessential example of why apportionment, as a practical construct, is unworkable. The legitimization of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Liability and Compensation Act (CERCLA) apportionment is owed to the U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up