FORUM COLUMN
By Ronald A. Zumbrun In 2006, the United States Supreme Court rendered its highly anticipated decision in John Rapanos v. United States. The issue was whether the term "waters of the United States" as used in the Clean Water Act included wetlands on private property not directly abutting navigable waters. Of particular interest was the effect that the court's two newest members, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Sa...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In