This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Dec. 23, 2000

Delayed Disclosure

The statute requires that the judge consider using less drastic alternatives and weigh whether the discovery violations were willful.

        By Alex Ricciardulli
        
        When the judge presiding over the trial of the four Rampart police officers barred the prosecution from using several witnesses because they were disclosed to the defense too late, the question came to mind: Could a judge lawfully do that? A review of California's criminal discovery rules shows...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up