LOS ANGELES - Imposing a parole-revocation fine enacted two years after a defendant committed the underlying offenses is unconstitutional, an appellate court ruled Tuesday.
The retroactive fine improperly increases punishment for a crime, the 2nd District Court of Appeal held. People v. Callejas, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13401 (Cal. App. 2nd. Dist. Dec. 19, 2000).
The retroactive fine improperly increases punishment for a crime, the 2nd District Court of Appeal held. People v. Callejas, 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13401 (Cal. App. 2nd. Dist. Dec. 19, 2000).
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In
Enewsletter Sign-up
By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy
here.