During the course of arrests, police officers sometimes damage private property. A question courts often face is whether officers are immune from liability for such damage. A recent decision of the 5th District Court of Appeal misapplies immunity and highlights why the framework of governmental immunity warrants further attention.
In 1995, the state Supreme Court in Customer Co. v. City of Sacramento held neither an officer nor h...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In