This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 9, 2014

High court mulls retiree health benefits

With health care costs rising every day, public and private employers seek ways to limit health care for retirees, and retirees struggle to protect health benefits that most assumed were secure. By Tom Sinclair


By Tom Sinclair


With health care costs rising every day, public and private employers seek ways to limit health care for retirees, and retirees struggle to protect health benefits that most assumed were secure.


Two positions have emerged: one claims an enormous unfunded liability for retiree health care while the other notes that many states are obligated by their constitutions to make good on commitments to benefits made during active employment (e.g.,...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up