This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 3, 2014

VIDEO: More than one way to terminate copyright

Some literary estates might want to pay attention to a little-known termination quirk of the 1909 Copyright Act. By John M. Griffin


By John M. Griffin


Songwriters of the '70s are hustling down to courthouses around the country to take advantage of the 35-year termination provision written into the 1976 Copyright Act. However, there's a little known termination quirk of the 1909 Copyright Act that ought to get some novelists' heirs lining up right alongside them. No, the 1909 act doesn't have a termination clause you missed - but some literary estates might want to pay attentio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up