This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Juvenile

Nov. 26, 2014

The consent defense in the court of public opinion

Remarks made by a lawyer representing the LAUSD in a civil sexual abuse case have reignited controversy over the legality and propriety of raising the issue of underage consent to sexual activity with an adult. By Wendy L. Patrick


By Wendy L. Patrick


Remarks made by a lawyer representing the Los Angeles Unified School District in a civil sexual abuse case have reignited controversy over the legality and propriety of raising the issue of underage consent to sexual activity with an adult. The lawyer argued that a 14-year-old child should be able to consent to have sex with her math teacher. While the school was found not liable because it did not know about the teacher's conduct, the rem...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up