This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Mar. 31, 2010

Strategies for Litigating False Marking Cases

With over 100 "false marking suits" filed since Forest Group, Inc. v. Bon Tool Co., Scott Herbst and David Albagli of Finnegan advise on how to litigate and avoid such suits.

By Scott Herbst and David Albagli

There is a new species of patent plaintiff out there, one that sues patent holders who falsely mark their products as "patented." In case you had not heard, marking the word "patent" on a product, or "any word or number importing the same is patented," is if the product is not in fact covered by a U.S. patent a violation of federal statute 35 U.S.C. Section 292. The financial lure in these cases is the statutory fine, a prescribed "pena...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up