This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 23, 2010

A New Judicially Created Privilege For Lawyers?

What does it mean when an attorney signs an agreement "approved as to form and content?" Tim Reuben of Reuben Raucher & Blum has the answer.

By Tim Reuben

Good news for lawyers: In Freedman v. Brutzkus, 2010 DJDAR 3763, a case "of first impression," the 2nd District Court of Appeal has ruled that there is no "actionable representation" by an attorney to the other side when an attorney signs an agreement stating "approved as to form and content." Given that many settlement agreements contain just such an endorsement, it is no surprise that the Association of Southern California Defense Counsel filed an a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up