By Gretchen W. Taylor
While it is hard to dispute that the family court experience is only randomly effective in servicing the very litigants who are the reason for its existence, the inference that this is the fault of presiding and other judges for failing to implement 'appropriate' case management controls, or that the assumed lack of these controls has itself created a 'backlog,' may miss a more fundamental but nonetheless subtle point: Believing that only the county,...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In