This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Constitutional Law

Mar. 17, 2010

A Politically Popular, but Wrong Decision

Erwin Chemerinsky of UC Irvine School of Law has no doubt that the 9th Circuit came to a politically expedient decision in upholding the constitutionality of "under God."

By Erwin Chemerinsky

When my youngest child was in kindergarten in a Los Angeles public school in September 2003, she came home at the beginning of the second week and showed her mother and me how she had learned to recite the Pledge of Allegiance. As she said the words, "under God," her mother remarked to me that she thought that the 9th Circuit had declared that unconstitutional and that children no longer needed to say that. My daughter...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up