This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Litigation

Mar. 16, 2010

Work Product Ruling Ignores Realities of Litigation

Erik Swanholt and Sarah Conway of Jones Day say Coito v. Superior Court of Stanislaus County undercuts the attorney work product doctrine's basic premises.

By Erik Swanholt and Sarah Conway

On March 4, 2010, the Court of Appeal in California's 5th Appellate District held in Coito v. Superior Court of Stanislaus County that witness statements taken by an attorney or attorney's representative do not constitute work product and are therefore regularly discoverable. The Court of Appeal determined that the "weight of authority" in California holds that because witness statements are...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up