This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 13, 2010

False Patent Marking: The Next Frontier for IP Litigation

Sunil Kulkarni and Rachel Krevans of Morrison & Foerster discuss the advantages of a false marking suit and how to protect against being sued.

By Sunil Kulkarni and Rachel Krevans

In February 2010, over 30 lawsuits were filed against companies in myriad industries including computer, pharmaceuticals, consumer products, auto parts, and video games-alleging false patent marking under 35 U.S.C. Section 292. Even before this recent surge, false marking lawsuits had been increasing over the last few years, as plaintiffs' lawyers have realized the many advantages of a false marking suit over a traditional patent infr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up