Appellate Practice
Jan. 4, 2006
Panel Cites Genital Mutilation in Asylum Grant
SAN FRANCISCO - A sharply divided federal appeals court ruled that an Ethiopian couple should be granted asylum in the United States because they had a well-founded fear that their young daughter would be subject to genital mutilation if forced to return to their homeland.




Daily Journal Staff Writer
A sharply divided federal appeals court ruled that an Ethiopian couple should be granted asylum in the United States because they had a well-founded fear that their young daughter would be subject to genital mutilation if forced to return to their homeland.
An en banc panel of t...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In