This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Jan. 4, 2006

Panel Cites Genital Mutilation in Asylum Grant

SAN FRANCISCO - A sharply divided federal appeals court ruled that an Ethiopian couple should be granted asylum in the United States because they had a well-founded fear that their young daughter would be subject to genital mutilation if forced to return to their homeland.

By Itir Yakar
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        A sharply divided federal appeals court ruled that an Ethiopian couple should be granted asylum in the United States because they had a well-founded fear that their young daughter would be subject to genital mutilation if forced to return to their homeland.
        An en banc panel of t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up