Labor/Employment
Dec. 30, 2005
6th Circuit Offers Model for Handling Retaliation Claims
Focus Column - By Geoffrey S. Sheldon and Connie M. Chuang - In enacting the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. section 2000e-3(a) ("Title VII"), Congress made it unlawful for employers to "discriminate against" employees because they have "opposed" any practice made unlawful by Title VII, or because they have made a "charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this subchapter." 42 U.S.C.
By Geoffrey S. Sheldon and Connie M. Chuang
In enacting the anti-retaliation provision of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. section 2000e-3(a) ("Title VII"), Congress made it unlawful for employers to "discriminate against" employees because ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In