This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Dec. 10, 2005

Courts Burden Patentees With Sticking to Language of Claim

Focus Column - By Justin Beck, Alfredo Bismonte and Jeremy Duggan - The claims are the legal definition of a patented invention. As the Federal Circuit has said, "The name of the game is the claim." Nevertheless, in patent law, like horseshoes, sometimes "close" counts. A product may be different from what the patent claims, but still infringe, if close enough.

        
Focus Column

By Justin Beck, Alfredo Bismonte and Jeremy Duggan
        
        The claims are the legal definition of a patented invention. As the Federal Circuit has said, "The name of the game is the claim." Nevertheless, in patent law, like horseshoes, sometimes "close" counts. A pr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up