For reprint rights or to purchase a copy of your Daily Journal photo, email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices or call 949-702-5390.

To buy more copies, call 866-531-1492 or email subscribe@dailyjournal.com
This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Top 10 Most Read

9th Circuit reverses felony firearm conviction

May 9, 2024

Supreme Court raises doubts over constitutionality of taxpayer protection initiative

May 9, 2024

Commission on Judicial Appointments confirms 3 justices to courts of appeal

May 15, 2024

FBI believed Feuer 'obstructed justice' in litigation investigation, documents show

May 16, 2024

9th Circuit strikes down felon's firearm conviction

May 10, 2024

Biden’s proposed tax increases will hurt, especially in California

May 15, 2024

Judges' boycott of Columbia students is 'guilt by association'

May 9, 2024

Baker & Hostetler partner concealed conflict, commodities trader claims

May 9, 2024

Governor Newsom's revised budget cuts $97M from trial courts

May 10, 2024

DA transfers Grossman murder case after internal conflict allegation

May 14, 2024

Commercial Law

Jul. 6, 2001

Justices Ponder Sex-Act Question

RIVERSIDE - Does paying to watch two people perform sex acts with one another constitute prostitution, or is it legally protected under the First Amendment?

By Jason W. Armstrong
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        RIVERSIDE - Does paying to watch two people perform sex acts with one another constitute prostitution, or is it legally protected under the First Amendment?
        That's the question justices with th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.

Already a subscriber?

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)



By using our website, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. You can learn more about how we use cookies by reviewing our Privacy Policy here.