This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Letter to the Editor

Mar. 31, 2015

Opinion misguided on officer indemnification

Professor Joanna Schwartz recently wrote a guest column suggesting that law enforcement officers are unconcerned about possible adverse civil judgments when they are act in the field. But this is misguided. By Scott Wm. Davenport

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

Professor Joanna Schwartz recently wrote a guest column suggesting that law enforcement officers are unconcerned about possible adverse civil judgments when they are act in the field. ["Police unfazed by legal liability," March 24]. She suggested that because officers do not face the financial ramifications of a civil suit, the goal of deterring civil rights violations is unsatisfied. Schwartz even went so far as to question whether...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up