U.S. Supreme Court
Mar. 21, 2015
Workers need access to swift resolution of cases
If the U.S. Supreme Court rules that courts can review the EEOC's conciliation activities, it will have strong negative repercussions for women employed in blue collar, nontraditional occupations. By Jennifer A. Reisch
Jennifer Reisch
Of Counsel
Bryan Schwartz Law
labor & employment
UC Berkeley Boalt Hall
Jennifer is the former legal director of Equal Rights Advocates.
Mach Mining v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 13-1019
QUESTION
To what extent can a court enforce the EEOC's duty to conciliate discrimination claims before filing suit?
In Mach Mining v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court will address whether and to what extent employers can delay resolution of discrimination complaints by asking judges to inject ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In