This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Feb. 18, 2010

Sending Mixed Messages on Harassment Law

Robert Shwarts and Erin Connell of Orrick emphasize why employers, now more than ever, must take all appropriate steps to prevent and address harassment.

By Robert Shwarts and Erin Connell

The California Supreme Court's recent decisions of Hughes v. Pair, 46 Cal. 4th 1035 (2009) and Roby v. McKesson Corp., 47 Cal. 4th 686 (2009) send employers mixed messages on the current state of California harassment law, and emphasize that now, more than ever, employers must take all appropriate steps to prevent and address harassment in the workplace.

On one hand, Hughes v. Pair clarifies that the "severe...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up