By Hall Marston
To the uninitiated, a "suggestive Palma notice" may sound like the title of the latest racy telenovelas. But to the California appellate practitioner, a "suggestive Palma notice" marks the boundary between the authority of a court of original jurisdiction and a court of review, laced liberally with notions of due process. On Feb. 1, 2010, the California Supreme Court, by a 4 to 3 vote, Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superi...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In