This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Oct. 3, 2000

Buyers, Businesses Battle Over Arbitration Clauses in Contracts

WASHINGTON - Larketta Randolph just wants her day in court. The Alabama resident contends that, when she bought her $39,000 mobile home in 1994, the finance company failed to disclose that she would have to pay $15 a year for "vendors single interest" insurance, which protects the lien holder against repossession costs in case of default.

By David F. Pike
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        WASHINGTON - Larketta Randolph just wants her day in court.
        The Alabama resident contends that, when she bought her $39,000 mobile home in 1994, the finance company failed to disclose that she would have to pay $15 a year ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up