This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Appellate Practice

Feb. 25, 2011

Can Denial of Summary Judgment Based on Qualified Immunity Be Reviewed?

A U.S. Supreme Court ruling reinforces an important principle in issue preservation that no civil litigator should forget. By Margaret M. Grignon and David J. Bird of Reed Smith.


By Margaret A. Grignon and David J. Bird


In Ortiz v. Jordan, 2011 DJDAR 1218 (Jan. 24), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that a government official may not obtain appellate review of a district court order denying the official's motion for summary judgment based on a qualified immunity defense, after the court has conducted a full trial on the merits. The Supreme Court's decision resolves a split among the federal Courts of Appeals over thei...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up