This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Corporate

Feb. 25, 2011

Businesses and Plaintiffs Beware: The Defense Perspective on Kwikset

The fight over standing requirements for bringing consumer class actions is not over, defendants still have ammunition. By Daniel K. Slaughter of Stein & Lubin LLP.


By Daniel K. Slaughter


As has been noted, the state Supreme Court's recent decision in Kwikset Corp. v. Superior Court, 51 Cal.4th 310 (2011), together with In re Tobacco II Cases, 46 Cal.4th 298 (2009), loosens the standing requirements for bringing a consumer class action under the unfair-competition law (California Business & Professions Code Section 17200) and the fair advertising law (California Business & Professions Code Section 1...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up