This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Feb. 23, 2011

'Innocent Co-insureds’ Gain Broader Insurance Protection

The state Supreme Court determines that insurance companies must cover “innocent co-insureds” who suffer certain losses. By Stephen Huchting and Douglas Wood of Morris Polich & Purdy LLP.


By Stephen Huchting and Douglas Wood


On Feb. 17, in Century National Insurance Co. v. Garcia, the state Supreme Court declared the intentional loss and the dishonesty, fraud, or criminal conduct exclusions in a homeowner's policy to be invalid as to "innocent co-insureds." In resolving this previously unsettled issue, the Court concluded that both exclusions "impermissibly reduce coverage that is statutorily mandated" by California ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up