This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Corporate

Feb. 16, 2011

The Long Reach of Franchise Laws

How the effects of California's business franchise laws have spilled over into other practice areas. By David Gurnick of Lewitt Hackman.


By David Gurnick


Laws can have effects beyond the problem they solve. California's business franchise laws are an example. Distribution of goods and services through franchising expanded widely in the 1960s and 1970s. But so did fraudulent practices, such as franchisors promising returns and assistance they could not deliver. In 1970, Gov. Ronald Reagan signed the Franchise Investment Law (FIL) making California the first state with legislation to protect pot...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up