This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Feb. 11, 2011

Who Can Pursue a False Marking Claim?

The Federal Circuit rejects an attempt to limit standing to file false patent marking claims. By Guinevere L. Jobson of Fenwick & West.


By Guinevere L. Jobson


Early last fall, the Federal Circuit rejected a procedural attempt to curb the influx of "false patent marking" lawsuits by providing guidance on the standing requirements for pursuing false marking claims under 35 U.S. C. Section 292. Stauffer v. Brooks Brothers Inc., 619 F.3d 1321(Fed. Cir. 2010). Section 292 prohibits affixing the word "patent" to an unpatented article with the purpose of deceiving the public a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up