This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Feb. 9, 2011

Has Mediation Been Hijacked?

The state Supreme Court appears to have overlooked the practicalities of mediation. By Nancy Neal Yeend and Stephen Gizzi of Gizzi & Reep LLP.


By Nancy Neal Yeend and Stephen Gizzi


In 2004, Michael Cassel participated in mediation. In early 2005, he filed a malpractice action against the law firm that represented him, alleging that just before the mediation, his attorney unilaterally communicated a lowered settlement demand to the opposing counsel without Cassel's knowledge or consent.


In the lawsuit, Cassel offered evidence of the disclosure along with that of communications that occurred...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up