This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 1, 2011

Court Rules in Lawyer Contract Dispute

An appellate court flipped a trial court's decision in a lawyer fee-sharing contract dispute.


By Ciaran McEvoy


Daily Journal Staff Writer


LOS ANGELES - A state appellate court has rejected a trial lawyer's efforts to collect the $1.3 million he paid to another attorney in connection with a fee-sharing arrangement gone sour, ruling the agreement gave inadequate notice to the attorneys' clients.


The 2nd District Court of Appeal on Thursday reversed a lower court's ruling that James L. Brown was to refund more than $900,000 of...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up