On Jan. 11, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments on whether a foreign manufacturer may be sued by an injured user of its product in a state in which it neither undertook business activities nor specifically targeted for the sale of its product. Based on the concerns expressed by some of the members of the Court, it appears likely that the Court will reverse the New Jersey Supreme Court's decision upholding the exercise of jurisdiction in J...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In