This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You have to be a subscriber to view this page.

Labor/Employment

Apr. 28, 2000

Commute Control

Practitioner: Employment Law By Joan E. Smiles As long as the time spent is under the "control" of the employer, the time is compensable, even if the employee is not actually working.

By Joan E. Smiles
         On March 27, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Morillion v. Royal Packing Co., 2000 Daily Journal D.A.R. 3193 (March 27, 2000), a case that may have wide-reaching implications for employers with regard to the determination of their obligations to pay non exempt employees minimum wage and overtime for "hours worked."
  ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up