The line between an unenforceable "agreement to agree" and a binding contract can be an obscure one. It was this ambiguity that determined the fate of a deal five years in the making, which culminated in a 38-page letter of intent (LOI) that unequivocally stated it was "fully binding." However, when one party unexpectedly abandoned the deal, a California court held that the LOI was non-binding. This outcome ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In