This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Nov. 22, 2012

In closely watched case, plaintiffs' lawyers say cashiers cannot be forced to stand

In their closing arguments Tuesday, defense attorneys for Kmart Corp. argued that requiring seats for cashiers is bad for business, while the plaintiffs said it is simply against the law to force them to stand.


By Hadley Robinson


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO - In their closing arguments Tuesday, defense attorneys for Kmart Corp. argued that requiring seats for cashiers is bad for business, while the plaintiffs said it is simply against the law to force them to stand.


The case, brought by cashiers in Kmart's Tulare store, revolves around a little-known or tested California labor law requiring employees to be able to sit if the "na...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up