This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 21, 2012

Certiorari denied in privately-owned public utility inverse condemnation case

Many privately owned public utilities were hoping the state Supreme Court would grant review and hold that inverse condemnation law did not apply to them. By Craig S. Simon & Mark S. Grotefeld


By Craig S. Simon and Mark S. Grotefeld


On Nov. 14 the state Supreme Court denied review to Southern California Edison, which sought reversal of Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. Southern California Edison Co., 208 Cal. App. 4th 1400 (Aug. 30, 2012). This new Court of Appeal decision upholds and explains Barham v. Southern California Edison Co., 74 Cal. App. 4th 744 (1999), which concluded that any public utility can be liable for an unconstitutiona...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up