This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Feb. 15, 2007

Arbitration Bind

Focus Column - By Jerome J. Blum and Allan Herzlich - Arbitration is supposed to make the resolution of attorney-client disputes easy, but it doesn't always work out that way. Two specialists take a stab at reconciling California's inconsistent rules on the subject.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Jerome J. Blum and Allan Herzlich

      A ttorney retainer agreements often provide binding-arbitration provisions for resolution of fee and nonfee disputes, including malpractice. Are such provisions enforceable? What alternatives are available?
      In Schatz v. Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory, 2007 DJDAR 407, the 4th District Court of Appeal held recently that a b...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up