By Brent Kendall
Daily Journal Staff Writer
WASHINGTON - When the U.S. Supreme Court two years ago struck down mandatory federal guidelines on criminal sentencing, judges suddenly were liberated from a system that had boxed them in for nearly 20 years.
The high court's ruling in U.S. v. Booker, 534 U.S. 220, which rendered the guidelines merely advisory, gave federal trial courts ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
WASHINGTON - When the U.S. Supreme Court two years ago struck down mandatory federal guidelines on criminal sentencing, judges suddenly were liberated from a system that had boxed them in for nearly 20 years.
The high court's ruling in U.S. v. Booker, 534 U.S. 220, which rendered the guidelines merely advisory, gave federal trial courts ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In