This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Aug. 1, 2007

Mini-Openings Sometimes Persuade Juries to Stick Around

A new rule allowing attorneys to make mini opening statements to potential jurors helps refine the jury selection process and "level the playing field," says litigator Mark V. Berry, right, standing with his law-firm partner Jeffrey A. Swedo.

By Rebecca Beyer
Daily Journal Staff Writer

      LOS ANGELES - The difference between a hung-jury and an acquittal for a public defender representing an accused child molester in Arizona turned out to be mini-opening statements.
      For Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Jacqueline A. Connor, who worked on a committee to implement mini-opening statements in California, that story is a ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up