FORUM COLUMN
By Roberta Bennett and David Gamblin
Last month, the California Supreme Court ordered the parties in the consolidated gay marriage cases pending before it to file supplemental briefs addressing several distinct questions. The parties' answers to those questions will ostensibly assist the court in determining whether domestic partnership is constitutionally congruous to marriage so as to grant same- and opposite...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In