This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Jul. 20, 2007

Chasing Seizure

Focus Column - By Jennifer Addams - A recent Supreme Court case analyzes whether a fleeing suspect who was paralyzed in a car chase had his Fourth Amendment rights violated through an "unreasonable seizure."

FOCUS COLUMN

By Jennifer Addams

      The Supreme Court has ruled that no violation of the Fourth Amendment occurred when a police officer decided to terminate a high-speed pursuit by ramming the back of a fleeing motorist's vehicle. Because the car chase posed a substantial and immediate risk of serious physical injury to others, the officer's decision to terminate the chase by forcing the motorist off the road was reasonable and t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up