This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Entertainment & Sports

Oct. 31, 2012

After ruling on spooky movie, lawyers and creators weigh risks of free speech

Just in time for Halloween, a state appellate court ruled that a movie about the spooky home of the heiress to the Winchester firearms fortune didn't infringe on the trademarks of the real-life tourist attraction in San Jose.


By Jean Yung


Daily Journal Staff Writer


Just in time for Halloween, the 6th District Court of Appeal last week ruled that a movie about the spooky home of the heiress to the Winchester firearms fortune didn't infringe on the trademarks of the real-life tourist attraction in San Jose.


The justices affirmed a lower court's award of summary judgment on First Amendment and fair-use grounds to Global Asylum Inc., which released "Haunti...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up