This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Insurance

Oct. 12, 2012

Court does a Du-over in bad faith failure to settle case

What started out as a nightmare for the insurance industry turned into an opinion that insurers will now be often citing. By Peter H. Klee, John T. Brooks and Charles A. Danaher of McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP


By Peter H. Klee, John T. Brooks and Charles A. Danaher


It was fair to say that before and after briefing was completed at the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, Du v. Deerbrook was not on anybody's radar screen: the jury had returned a unanimous defense verdict after 28 minutes on three independent grounds, and the panel vacated oral arguments. By all appearances, an unpublished per curiam affirmance was on the way.


When the court'...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up