This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 10, 2012

Lawyers (and judges) confused by default judgments

Despite attempts to streamline the process, appellate courts have repeatedly demonstrated that lawyers and trial judges are often confused by the rules of default proceedings. By Mark Wagner of Wagner Legal Group


By Mark Wagner


In California, if a party does not file a timely responsive pleading to a lawsuit (e.g., answer or demurrer), a default can be entered by filing an Application to Enter Default. After entry of default, the plaintiff then has to "prove up" the default in court and allow the judge to enter default judgment, though there are certain cases that allow default judgment by the clerk (e.g., contract collection cases with fixed amounts). Despite a...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up