This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 6, 2012

Rolling capital contributions and the Ginsu knife: Part Two

It shouldn't come as a shock that law firms active in the lateral hiring market want to distinguish themselves from Dewey. By Ed Reeser


By Edwin Reeser


Recruiters are standing by to take your call.


What happens when the firm comes in 12 to 14 percent below targeted compensation for the equity partners? Does the firm "discount" the amount of equity required? Do they give every partner a return of capital? That is doubtful. So now our hypothetical partner with the $100k raise winds up collecting $688k and not $800k. But the partner had to put up $42k ($84k pretax), so the take ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up