This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Environmental

Oct. 4, 2012

High court addresses CEQA limitations

In order for a Notice of Exemption to trigger CEQA's 35-day statute of limitations, it must be facially valid and properly filed. By David H. Blackwell of Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP


By David H. Blackwell


In 2010, the state Supreme Court issued two decisions - Committee for Green Foothills v. Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors, (2010) 48 Cal. 4th 32 (2010), and Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton, 48 Cal. 4th 481 (2010) - that emphasized that the filing of a Notice of Determination (NOD) or a Notice of Exemption (NOE), respectively, triggers the short statutes of limitations imposed by the California E...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up